Contract and Procurement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Contract and procurance - Essay ExampleOn a counter view of the get a line, the evidence stated should be indicated and devoted in the section as this would help in validating the information given. Moreover, for a cat to be successful every the internal regard documents should be well document and the information in those documents use otherwise the project will not be successful (Ramakrishna 2010). Amber color should have been apply to indicate that there are significant issues which need the managements attention despite a successful delivery. 2. Summary of report recommendations The recommendations given by the reappraisal time are worth piece of music as they provide a clear explanation of the situation in the entity. The recommendation time trope could either be Recommended, Critical and Essential. The review uses the Recommended time frame. Recommended means that the recommendations given should be beneficial to the project and should be linked to the project milesto nes, and this should be before the contract is signed. On a critical confidential information view, the recommendations given by should be based on the three time frames given the other dickens are based on the successful outcome of the project depending on how fast action is interpreted a situation which affects the project. 3. Background and business case The background of the project is clearly stated with the project name and the programme. The problems facing the stated projects are also indicated which explains why the stated project are in need of improvements. The cost estimates for the improvements, the procurement delivery status including the start and expiry date, current position in regard to the OGC Gateway Review and conduct of the OGC Gateway Review have been well stated in connection to the business case (Marks 2012). Enough has been provided about the background of the project, that is, the background is explicit. However, including the current position in regard to the OGC Gateway Review without sufficient information about the past reviews is absurd. The reviewer should have obtained all information from the previous four Gateway Reviews before embarking on writing his or her review. The previous review would help the reviewer to fully understand all the problems facing the project and the improvements which have been through on the projects. 4. Findings and recommendations The findings for the project have been given explicitly with all parameters well stated. All the strengths and weaknesses of the project including lack of right-hand(a) documentation and sufficient commitment to staff training and knowledge of training delivery amongst the main project teams have been elaborated. Validity of the project in connection to the business case has also been elaborated. The reviewer has done excellent in the elaboration of the findings of the project. The reviewer has gone(p) further ahead to give the plans for the ongoing improvements in p erformance and innovation which include the continuous improvement and planning and performance measures. The reviewer has also gone a head to provide the organizations learning and maturity targets and its readiness for the future or the plans for any suffice provision in the future. However, the